However, now I have time on my hands I have been undertaking a project for my artist wife Tanya, who has been studying and painting the native wetland birds on the Hawaiian island of Kauai. She has an exhibition scheduled for next year, and we’d like to publish a book to coincide with it. For more on the wetland birds, see Tanya’s blog.
So I’ve found myself back in old territory – creating what I hope will be a high-quality, heavily-illustrated, printed book.
(© Tanya Hill, 2009)
It has been a really enlightening experience to be able to compare the two processes – printed-page design, and Web page design.
To paraphrase Charles Dickens (From A Tale of Two Cities), as far as producing print is concerned, this is The Best of Times… The publishing tools available to the print designer are outstanding, highly-evolved, easy to learn and use. Many of the problems which used to beset print production in the past are long gone – for example, color matching, now taken care of by the systems themselves. Once set up, you can forget it.
When it comes to creating Web content, I believe this is still The Worst of Times. No-one has yet produced the right Web authoring tool, because the geeks – and not the “creative professionals” are in control. Oh, I know that’s a gross over-simplification. Many creative professionals have forced themselves to learn Web technology, and many geeks are also creative.
But the process of visual design and great typography on the Web is still far too hard.
After some thought, I picked Adobe’s InDesign publishing software to design, lay out and typeset the pages. In the past, I’ve mostly used Microsoft Publisher, since I worked at the company and it was installed as part of Microsoft Office.
However, this time I’m working with many large high-resolution scanned images, cropped and cleaned up in Adobe Photoshop. And I have to be sure that the color-matching is correct all the way through the process. Adobe Bridge allows you to synchronize color handling across all your Creative Suite applications. Hence InDesign seemed like the logical choice…
The InDesign process is simple. Choose your page size, margins etc. Flow in the text. Choose typefaces and sizes for body text, headings etc. Place the pictures. Proof the results on an ink-jet printer. Create a package with all the files and send it to the printer. Of course there are lots of details to take of – but it’s all really straightforward.
What a delight the whole process is, compared with the brutality, crudeness and downright missing functionality of Web authoring.
Take the fonts, for instance. I picked Papyrus, because I felt it suited the artistic nature of the content. No problem. And because InDesign is a professional’s tool, it knows that I have no true bold or italic versions of this font on my system – so it won’t let me choose them, and thus won’t create horrible, computer-skewed or emboldened bastardized versions. (Italic text is NOT slanted Roman!)
I couldn’t use Papyrus on the Web – not unless I wanted to either limit myself to users running Internet Explorer and hence with Embedded OpenType support, or create my text as bitmaps – ugh!
Try to create the heading stack and be sure it will display correctly on any Web browser? Unless you create a bitmap, you couldn’t. And of course people viewing the bitmap on different-resolution displays would get different sizes. Using Zoom to scale it would look awful, and so on and on and on…
Publishing is a highly-creative process. Creative writing. Creative editing. Creative Design and layout. Creative Typography. At least print publishing is. Web publishing tries to be, but you keep running up against the limitations of the medium.
It won’t last forever. It will get better. Print’s had 550 years to evolve. The Web hasn’t even had two decades. But the sooner we solve the problem of fonts on the Web – and the sooner someone builds a great Web design tool for creative people who don’t want to learn to be software engineers, the better…
Let’s get a standard set of markup and CSS defined. Let’s have all browsers support it and display it in the same way. Let’s get adaptive layout in place so the content looks its best on whatever display it’s viewed.
It’s not rocket science. But until it’s done the Web won’t be a real publishing platform.