Digital Independence Takes A Step Closer…

In 2007, it became clear to me that access to technology – especially computers and Internet connectivity – is critical to the future of reading.

There’s no question now that if reading does have a future – and it must – then that future is digital. We spent 550 years since Gutenberg developing a complex ecosystem in which people wrote content, which was then turned into dirty marks on shredded trees and distributed to the people who read it.

It’s hard to realize that, against this 550 years of history, the Internet went mainstream only about 15 years ago. So we’re really only at the very beginning of creating a new ecosystem which will replace the “Gutenberg” ecosystem.

That’s why we’re having all the thrash, controversy, legal action etc. around Intellectual Property, patents and so on. We forget it took developments like the international signing of the Berne Convention (spearheaded by French author Victor Hugo – which I wrote about in an earlier post) before authors’ and publishers’ rights were truly recognized and protected.

One of the key issues moving forward is: If digital technology is truly to replace paper, then how do we make sure that everyone has access to it?

We’re going through changes on a historic and global scale. I felt we needed a beacon to illuminate a long-term goal to which we could all aspire. And that was why in 2007 I wrote the Digital Declaration of Independence which always appears at the head of every post on this blog:

We hold this truth to be self-evident: That every human has an equal and unalienable right to the means to create, distribute and consume information to realize their full potential for Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness – regardless of the country they live in, their gender, beliefs, racial origin, language or any impairments they may have.

I took as my model the US Declaration of Independence. It wasn’t a goal which would be reached in just a few years, but was truly long-term. After all, the 1776 Declaration stated that all men (!) were created free and equal, with certain inalienable rights. But it took more than 200 years before the United States could elect a black President, and it could take a while yet before we see a woman President (unless Sarah Palin performs a miracle – in which case I’m heading back to Europe :-))

Although it is a long-term goal, there are at least some signs that some governments are beginning to realize the importance of universal high-speed access to the Internet.

CNN reported last month that Finland became the first country in the world to declare broadband Internet access a legal right. The move by Finland is aimed at bringing Web access to rural areas, where access has been limited.

According to CNN:

“Starting in July, telecommunication companies in the northern European nation will be required to provide all 5.2 million citizens with Internet connection that runs at speeds of at least 1 megabit per second.

The one-megabit mandate, however, is simply an intermediary step, said Laura Vilkkonen, the legislative counselor for the Ministry of Transport and Communications.

The country is aiming for speeds that are 100 times faster — 100 megabit per second — for all by 2015.

“We think it’s something you cannot live without in modern society. Like banking services or water or electricity, you need Internet connection,” Vilkkonen said.

“Universal service is every citizen’s subjective right,” Vilkkonen said.

CNN reported that the United Nations is making a big push to deem Internet access a human right, and in June, France’s highest court declared such access a human right. But Finland goes a step further by legally mandating speed.

The news network also pointed out that the United States is the only industrialized nation without a national policy to promote high-speed broadband, according to a study released in August by the Communications Workers of America, the country’s largest media union.

Forty-six percent of rural households do not subscribe to broadband, and usage varies based on income, the study found.

In February, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission is expected to submit a national plan to Congress. The FCC says that expanding service will require subsidies and investment of as much as $350 billion — much higher than the $7.2 billion President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus package has set aside for the task.

There’s a long way to go. But at least there are the first signs of movement towards the digital future…


7 thoughts on “Digital Independence Takes A Step Closer…

  1. bowerbird

    > In 2007, it became clear to me > that access to technology – > especially computers and > Internet connectivity – is > critical to the future of reading.2007, eh?well, better late than never…-bowerbird

  2. Robert Maxwell Case

    Bill, For several generations my family has lived from time to time in rural locales. The high cost of serving low-population-density areas hampered both rural electrification and telephone service. The U.S. government became involved in both by encouraging rural cooperatives to build-out the infrastructure. I'm not sure how Scotland and other countries did electric and telephone, but it seems to me that Finland is on the right track with regard to internet connectivity. I wholeheartedly agree with you that a high speed connection is a human right.

  3. Richard Fink

    Bill,The interviewer from the NYTimes who interviewed Jeff Bezos on the following *must* have Googled and found you.She asked Bezos:"What do you say to Kindle users who like to read in the bathtub?"and"What if you dropped your Kindle in the bathtub?"Questions For Jeffrey P. BezosBezos must have Googled you, as well, before responding.Ziplock bag and all.And not a mention of Bill Hill – who pioneered the whole concept of ebooks as a waterproof medium.It ain't right.

  4. Mary Youngblood

    Well Bill…metaphysically speaking, if indeed a miracle is "performed" by Sarah Palin we should vote her in…in a hurry!!!As for giddy up internet systems and ungodly apostrophes….all's I know…is nothing.

  5. Tim

    Bill: Stumbled across your site and very happy I did. I've enjoyed reading your opinions on technology vs. print. This seems to be the year of the eReader (2010) and I am both excited and concerned. We're faced with the opportunity to fundamentally evolve the written word, but the content I have seen thus far leaves much to be desired and seems more like a straight port of text without thinking about how books could be fundamentally enhanced.I wrote an essay about this back in the very early nineties and recently pulled it from the archives and posted it to my site. You might be interested: .Would love to correspond and hear what projects you may be following, participating in, or leading now. Need a passionate designer?Cheers,Tim SmithApplied Design Group


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s